PDA

View Full Version : Ten principles for a black swan proof world


kincella
09-04-2009, 01:08 PM
I copied this post from another blog site.....one of the best articles I have read in a long time
.................................................. ....................
Ten principles for a Black Swan-proof world
By Nassim Nicholas Taleb

Published: April 7 2009 20:02 | Last updated: April 7 2009 20:02

1. What is fragile should break early while it is still small. Nothing should ever become too big to fail. Evolution in economic life helps those with the maximum amount of hidden risks – and hence the most fragile – become the biggest.

2. No socialisation of losses and privatisation of gains. Whatever may need to be bailed out should be nationalised; whatever does not need a bail-out should be free, small and risk-bearing. We have managed to combine the worst of capitalism and socialism. In France in the 1980s, the socialists took over the banks. In the US in the 2000s, the banks took over the government. This is surreal.

3. People who were driving a school bus blindfolded (and crashed it) should never be given a new bus. The economics establishment (universities, regulators, central bankers, government officials, various organisations staffed with economists) lost its legitimacy with the failure of the system. It is irresponsible and foolish to put our trust in the ability of such experts to get us out of this mess. Instead, find the smart people whose hands are clean.

4. Do not let someone making an “incentive” bonus manage a nuclear plant – or your financial risks. Odds are he would cut every corner on safety to show “profits” while claiming to be “conservative”. Bonuses do not accommodate the hidden risks of blow-ups. It is the asymmetry of the bonus system that got us here. No incentives without disincentives: capitalism is about rewards and punishments, not just rewards.

5. Counter-balance complexity with simplicity. Complexity from globalisation and highly networked economic life needs to be countered by simplicity in financial products. The complex economy is already a form of leverage: the leverage of efficiency. Such systems survive thanks to slack and redundancy; adding debt produces wild and dangerous gyrations and leaves no room for error. Capitalism cannot avoid fads and bubbles: equity bubbles (as in 2000) have proved to be mild; debt bubbles are vicious.

6. Do not give children sticks of dynamite, even if they come with a warning . Complex derivatives need to be banned because nobody understands them and few are rational enough to know it. Citizens must be protected from themselves, from bankers selling them “hedging” products, and from gullible regulators who listen to economic theorists.

7. Only Ponzi schemes should depend on confidence. Governments should never need to “restore confidence”. Cascading rumours are a product of complex systems. Governments cannot stop the rumours. Simply, we need to be in a position to shrug off rumours, be robust in the face of them.

8. Do not give an addict more drugs if he has withdrawal pains. Using leverage to cure the problems of too much leverage is not homeopathy, it is denial. The debt crisis is not a temporary problem, it is a structural one. We need rehab.

9. Citizens should not depend on financial assets or fallible “expert” advice for their retirement. Economic life should be definancialised. We should learn not to use markets as storehouses of value: they do not harbour the certainties that normal citizens require. Citizens should experience anxiety about their own businesses (which they control), not their investments (which they do not control).

10. Make an omelette with the broken eggs. Finally, this crisis cannot be fixed with makeshift repairs, no more than a boat with a rotten hull can be fixed with ad-hoc patches. We need to rebuild the hull with new (stronger) materials; we will have to remake the system before it does so itself. Let us move voluntarily into Capitalism 2.0 by helping what needs to be broken break on its own, converting debt into equity, marginalising the economics and business school establishments, shutting down the “Nobel” in economics, banning leveraged buyouts, putting bankers where they belong, clawing back the bonuses of those who got us here, and teaching people to navigate a world with fewer certainties.

Then we will see an economic life closer to our biological environment: smaller companies, richer ecology, no leverage. A world in which entrepreneurs, not bankers, take the risks and companies are born and die every day without making the news.

In other words, a place more resistant to black swans.

The writer is a veteran trader, a distinguished professor at New York University’s Polytechnic Institute and the author of The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable

bluelabel
10-04-2009, 06:48 AM
Great article Kincella. One thing really stood out to me considering the current economic climate and that is the little passage below.

No incentives without disincentives: capitalism is about rewards and punishments, not just rewards. (

IMO the capitalist system should be left to falter and those responsible (CEO's on exhorbatent salaries) need to be held accountable. How can someone be paid $32 million dollars for running a company. I have said this before and i will say it again. It is not like they cured cancer!

Corporate governance needs to be reworked to include caps on salaries or at least shareholder votes on salaries and more emphasis on social involvement and accountability. Currently there are only provisions that it should occur. Philanthropic public companies should be rewarded, not by naming rights either. (just to stop the peter jackson lung transplant centre from opening).

The alcopops tax is on the right track, i do not however agree with it, it is just a cash grab. The revenue from such a thing should be directed into prevention or education programs, if you do not donate, you get taxed. There needs to be a clear audit trail from tax revenue to the 'related program'. Yes it is a disincentive from being in business, but it is also an incentive for increased social standing.

All in all i think i'd rather be known for doing my bit.

(im going to leave it there and maybe come back to this later, thats enough ranting for 630 in the morning on a public holiday! I'm not even sure it makes sense)

:bier:

blue

sarahJohn
17-04-2009, 04:50 PM
Great article Kincella.keep up the work!!!!

Nothing should ever become too big to fail. Evolution in economic life helps those with the maximum amount of hidden risks – and hence the most fragile – become the biggest.

kincella
17-04-2009, 05:03 PM
nothing too big to fail...look at the monopoly that safeway and coles have on our food and the like....should one fail...or both ??? where would we all go...all so dependent on those two for almost everything....
they go into a small town...once the population reaches say 2000 (guess) in the early days they undercut the price of all the local shops...effectively running them out of business...then once the little ones are gone...the big boys hike their prices up.....
so what if they did that...just like the banks did ages ago...they shut down all the branches in the country towns....so now some towns only have one of these big ones...shut it down and people have to drive to another major centre

have noticed recently since safeway upgraded its stores...less than 6 items for each product on the shelves....so I go to buy my dog 7 packs for the week I cannot,,,take 6 and another shopper misses out,,,often find there is none of her fav food there...and being fussy she will not eat the other
I can no longer do a weekly shop...and have to drive around to the other safeway stores to get what I need....so of course now discovered coles...but they seem to have a lot of different brands to safeway...
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr